<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Inside CM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 06:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The secret to reducing stress, being happy and living a fulfilling life. by Mehr...</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/creative/the-secret-to-reducing-stress-being-happy-and-living-a-fulfilling-life/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehr...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 06:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4397#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>Remarkable! Its actually awesome article, I have got much clear idea 
about from this piece of writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarkable! Its actually awesome article, I have got much clear idea<br />
about from this piece of writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Double or Single Space? by Charity</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/creative/double-or-single-space/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4621#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>I hate it when someone tries to argue for the double space after a period, but thanks to your blog, I now have a clear, historical defense to back up my argument!! Thanks Arica!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it when someone tries to argue for the double space after a period, but thanks to your blog, I now have a clear, historical defense to back up my argument!! Thanks Arica!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social media: The Brutal Truth by Angela Trumbaturi</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/social-media/social-media-the-brutal-truth/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Trumbaturi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4575#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>Nice points, Meredith. As CM&#039;s Social Media Manager, I have a few thoughts to add from my perspective. While I appreciate Simon’s attempt to provide a different perspective, I think he falls short with his bold assumptions about the views of social media practitioners. I believe that if he actually spoke with true practitioners, and not just talking heads, he’d come to find out that our views are more alike than different.

To start off, his statement that, &quot;Many social-media &#039;experts&#039; insist that a &#039;two-way conversation&#039; between marketers and consumers is the whole point of social, and anything less than that is a reflection of outdated, broadcast-style thinking. &quot; While it&#039;s true that a two-way conversation plays an important role in social media, it&#039;s far from being the &quot;whole point&quot; of social efforts. Sure, engagement can be considered a sign of success but social also supplements traditional marketing and advertising efforts. Social media is just another form of communicating.

He goes on to position a social media practitioner’s view of the “unengaged”, listening audience as a bad thing. I can’t obviously speak for the entire industry, but here at CM we value &quot;listening&quot; consumers. We know that many types of people make up a brand’s online community. If we have audience members who opt in with a “like” or “tweet” and are receptive to consuming our messages, well that’s considered a good thing. Even if they never say a darn thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice points, Meredith. As CM's Social Media Manager, I have a few thoughts to add from my perspective. While I appreciate Simon’s attempt to provide a different perspective, I think he falls short with his bold assumptions about the views of social media practitioners. I believe that if he actually spoke with true practitioners, and not just talking heads, he’d come to find out that our views are more alike than different.</p>
<p>To start off, his statement that, "Many social-media 'experts' insist that a 'two-way conversation' between marketers and consumers is the whole point of social, and anything less than that is a reflection of outdated, broadcast-style thinking. " While it's true that a two-way conversation plays an important role in social media, it's far from being the "whole point" of social efforts. Sure, engagement can be considered a sign of success but social also supplements traditional marketing and advertising efforts. Social media is just another form of communicating.</p>
<p>He goes on to position a social media practitioner’s view of the “unengaged”, listening audience as a bad thing. I can’t obviously speak for the entire industry, but here at CM we value "listening" consumers. We know that many types of people make up a brand’s online community. If we have audience members who opt in with a “like” or “tweet” and are receptive to consuming our messages, well that’s considered a good thing. Even if they never say a darn thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animal Crazed by Beth</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/branding/animal-crazed/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4567#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...it was effective enough marketing to make you go to a fake sight and sign up on a waiting list for a fake miniature giraffe.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm...it was effective enough marketing to make you go to a fake sight and sign up on a waiting list for a fake miniature giraffe.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paper by 53 by Bobby B</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/creative/paper-by-53/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4583#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a decidedly unskilled artist and I find the medium &#039;Paper&#039; provides to be easy to use and inspiring. Great drawing and post Lisa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a decidedly unskilled artist and I find the medium 'Paper' provides to be easy to use and inspiring. Great drawing and post Lisa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whoa, cowboy! Pump the brakes! by Charity</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/creative/whoa-cowboy-pump-the-brakes/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4558#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>OMG! I totes agree with all of that!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! I totes agree with all of that!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did Facebook pay one billion dollars for Instagram? by Angela Trumbaturi</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/social-media/why-did-facebook-pay-one-billion-dollars-for-instagram/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Trumbaturi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4547#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Yes, you&#039;re spot on by pointing out the IPO. I neglected to mention it and I&#039;m sure that was a major factor. Concerning Pinterest, I think Zuck opted for Instagram because IG can be easily incorporated into the Facebook platform whereas Pinterest is an entirely different way of sharing. Pinterest is also becoming a hot bed for spam and has a lot of issues to work out with copyright infringements etc., i.e. more headaches for Zuck. But like you said, I&#039;m sure he&#039;s still got to be lusting after it. A platform he wants to conquer, for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you're spot on by pointing out the IPO. I neglected to mention it and I'm sure that was a major factor. Concerning Pinterest, I think Zuck opted for Instagram because IG can be easily incorporated into the Facebook platform whereas Pinterest is an entirely different way of sharing. Pinterest is also becoming a hot bed for spam and has a lot of issues to work out with copyright infringements etc., i.e. more headaches for Zuck. But like you said, I'm sure he's still got to be lusting after it. A platform he wants to conquer, for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did Facebook pay one billion dollars for Instagram? by Katy Miller</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/social-media/why-did-facebook-pay-one-billion-dollars-for-instagram/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4547#comment-999</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s all posturing for the IPO. There can&#039;t be anything else on Zuck&#039;s mind right now, so why else? He&#039;s likely more threatened by Pinterest than by Instagram, so I thought it was an interesting choice to pursue them. Then again, this could have been going on behind the scenes prior to when Pinterest hit the big time in 4Q last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it's all posturing for the IPO. There can't be anything else on Zuck's mind right now, so why else? He's likely more threatened by Pinterest than by Instagram, so I thought it was an interesting choice to pursue them. Then again, this could have been going on behind the scenes prior to when Pinterest hit the big time in 4Q last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radio-active: Should Advertisers Run from Rush? by Charity</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/media/radio-active-should-advertisers-run-from-rush/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4495#comment-990</guid>
		<description>I think that brands who get involved in the controversy are more subject to criticism than those who simply fly under the radar and act oblivious. So I would just ride the wave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that brands who get involved in the controversy are more subject to criticism than those who simply fly under the radar and act oblivious. So I would just ride the wave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &quot;It&#039;s not marketing. It&#039;s just art.&quot; by Charity</title>
		<link>http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/creative/its-not-marketing-its-just-art/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentmarketing.com/insidecm/?p=4484#comment-972</guid>
		<description>I think Mr. Unwin should admit that the installation actually IS marketing. The whole thing is part of the Cosmopolitan Hotel guest experience and, therefore, the brand. It is doing far more for the brand than running ads on the columns would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mr. Unwin should admit that the installation actually IS marketing. The whole thing is part of the Cosmopolitan Hotel guest experience and, therefore, the brand. It is doing far more for the brand than running ads on the columns would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

